BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Medical Policy Manual

Laparoscopic, Percutaneous and Transcervical Techniques for the Myolysis of Uterine Fibroids

DESCRIPTION

Uterine fibroids (i.e., uterine leiomyomas or uterine myomas) are one of the most common conditions affecting women in their reproductive years. Symptoms include heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure or pain, urinary frequency, and reproductive dysfunction. Surgery, including hysterectomy and various myomectomy procedures, is considered the standard treatment. Because of the potential for surgical complications such as pelvic adhesions, and loss of the uterus with hysterectomy, minimally invasive laparoscopic, percutaneous and transcervical percutaneous techniques to induce myolysis (shrink or degenerate the tissue) have been proposed. These procedures include radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation (e.g., Acessa™, Sonata®), laser and bipolar needles, cryomyolysis, and magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser ablation.

POLICY

MEDICAL APPROPRIATENESS

IMPORTANT REMINDERS

SOURCES  

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2021, June). Management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 228. Retrieved July 6, 2021 from www.acog.org.

Arnreiter, C., & Oppelt, P. (2021). A systematic review of the treatment of uterine myomas using transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation with the sonata system. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28 (8), 1462–1469. Abstract retrieved September 19, 2023 from PubMed database.

BlueCross BlueShield Association. Evidence Positioning System. (2023, March). Laparoscopic and percutaneous techniques for the myolysis of uterine fibroids (4.01.19). Retrieved September 15, 2023 from http://www.evidencepositioningsystem.com. (39 articles and/or guidelines reviewed)

Bradley, L.D., Pasic, R.P., & Miller, L.E. (2019). Clinical performance of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of uterine fibroids: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 29 (12), 1507-1517. (Level 2 evidence)

Brucker, S., Hahn, M., Kraemer, D., Taran, F., Isaacson, K. & Krämer, B. (2014). Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids versus laparoscopic myomectomy. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 125 (2014), 261–265. (Level 2 evidence)

Hahn, M., Brucker, S., Kraemer, D., Wallwiener, M., Taran, F., Wallwiener, C., et al. (2015). Radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids and laparoscopic myomectomy: long-term follow-up from a randomized trial. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 75 (5), 442-449. (Level 2 evidence)

Havryliuk, Y., Setton, R., Carlow, J., & Shaktman, B. (2017). Symptomatic fibroid management: systematic review of the literature. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 21 (3), DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00041. (Level 2 evidence)

Hudgens, J., Johns, D.A., Lukes, A.S., Forstein, D.A., & Delvadia, D. (2019). 12-month outcomes of the US patient cohort in the SONATA pivotal IDE trial of transcervical ablation of uterine fibroids. International Journal of Women’s Health, 11, 387-394.(Level 4 evidence)

Lin, L., Ma, H., Wang, J., Quality of life, adverse events, and reintervention outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis Guan, H., Yang, M., Tong, X., & Zou, Y. (2019). Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 26 (3), 409-416. Abstract retrieved November 7, 2019 from PubMed database.

Lukes, A & Green, M.A. (2020). Three-year results of the SONATA pivotal trial of transcervical fibroid ablation for symptomatic uterine myomata. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2020.0021. (Level 3 evidence)

Miller, C.E & Osman, K.M. (2019). Transcervical radiofrequency ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2-year results of the SONATA pivotal trial. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 35 (6): 345-349. (Level 3 evidence)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2021, March). Transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Retrieved June 15, 2022 from http://www.nice.org.uk.                                                                                                                                                   

Sandberg, E.M., Tummers, F.H.M.P., Cohen, S.L., van den Haak, L, Dekkers, OM., & Jansen, F.W. (2018). Reintervention risk and quality of life outcomes after uterine-sparing interventions for fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility & Sterility, 109 (4), 698-707. (Level 1 evidence)

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. (2012, November). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification Database. K121858 (Acessa Guidance). Retrieved July 29, 2013 from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov.  

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. (2018, July). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification Database. K173703 (Sonata Guidance). Retrieved December 18, 2020 from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov. 

Winifred S. Hayes, Inc. Health Technology Assessment. (2020, September; last update search June 2023). Transcervical radiofrequency ablation with the sonata system for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Retrieved September 15, 2023 from www.Hayesinc.com/subscribers. (24 articles and/or guidelines reviewed)

Winifred S. Hayes, Inc. Health Technology Brief. (2019, December; last update search February 2023). Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation (Acessa system; Halt Medical inc.) for treatment of uterine fibroids. Retrieved September 15, 2023 from www.Hayesinc.com/subscribers. (37 articles and/or guidelines reviewed)

Zhang, J., Go, V. A., Blanck, J. F., & Singh, B. (2022). A systematic review of minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroid-related bleeding. Reproductive Sciences, 29 (10), 2786–2809. Abstract retrieved September 19, 2023 from PubMed database.

ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE:  1/11/2014

MOST RECENT REVIEW DATE:  11/9/2023

ID_BA

Policies included in the Medical Policy Manual are not intended to certify coverage availability. They are medical determinations about a particular technology, service, drug, etc. While a policy or technology may be medically necessary, it could be excluded in a member's benefit plan. Please check with the appropriate claims department to determine if the service in question is a covered service under a particular benefit plan. Use of the Medical Policy Manual is not intended to replace independent medical judgment for treatment of individuals. The content on this Web site is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice in any way. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider if you have questions regarding a medical condition or treatment.

This document has been classified as public information.